Thursday 1 March 2012

Story Board ideas

Tamasin has proposed a presentation layout which looks rather nice, following the idea of a silent movie in black and white in a power point presentation as you can all see in the emails that have been going around today.
I proposed an alternative way based on Tamasin's idea, following the same principle but presented in a more compact way. It's still Tamasin's idea though, that can still be presented in Powerpoint or PDF as we wish.

Here is my way of presenting it: Black area for image presentation and white area for  titles and text. Yes, it is a template that will be the same as it goes along through the storyboard.


Tamasin's is a power point: - first two pages only. the rest of the presentation is presented in a sequence of Black sheets containing the titles and description and the white sheets containing the images which are sketches, drawings, concepts, etc...

Choose the one you like and then we'll decide which will be our way of presenting our work as a story.


Wednesday 29 February 2012

Some notes on William Whyte's The Social Life of Small Urban Spaces

William Whyte was an American urbanist, organisational analyst, journalist and people-watcher.  The theories set out in The Social Life of Small Urban Spaces are based on mass observation of people's behaviour in public spaces in the United States and elsewhere in the 1970s.
As he admits himself, his findings are hardly revelatory but he does highlight a number of issues which are apparently overlooked in many designs for urban plazas, squares and parks and he makes a number of straightforward recommendations for making such spaces more 'user friendly' and therefore successful:
1. Circulating and gathering - somewhat against common sense, people seem to prefer to stop, talk and sit either on or as close as possible to active circulation routes.
2. Seating - people want places to sit, so provide as much seating as possible; walls, edges of planters or water features, steps and other changes in level can all be designed to be multi-functional without much effort (in fact, Whyte's view is that it is generally more difficult to make them 'unsittable'!); chairs (with backs) are better than benches; choice is important so make seating movable if possible. Specifics - length/quantity: min. 300mm length for every 2.75m2 of plaza area; width: (single-sided) min. 400mm, (double-sided) min. 760mm; height: 300-900mm
3. Sun, wind, trees, and water - provide choice of sunny or shady areas (weather permitting); try to 'borrow' light (using reflective surfaces) if the space is north facing or overshadowed; wind and drafts are usually unwelcome, so small parks enclosed on 3 sides work well; tall buildings can often cause drafts and turbulence; trees - at least 6, of good size, for a space of 450m2 or 1 per 7.5m of pavement (sidewalk), ideally close to seating - to moderate climate, provide sense of enclosure, shade (in appealing patterns), etc. Water - should be accessible and not just for looking at; moving water can help to create a quiet and restful feel by masking the worst aspects of street noise.
4.  Food - food outlets (even if only 'snack shacks') will draw people to a space, as will retail units; by compressing food outlets and any related seating into a small area, people are encouraged (forced) into unplanned meetings and conversations.
4. Connectivity to the street - it has to be easy to both see and get into the space, with a subtle transition from street to plaza/park; a slight rise in level can be inviting, but no more than a metre, and never (or rarely) sunken.
5. 'Undesirables' - Whyte suggests that the measures taken to control and keep out 'undesirables' are more detrimental than the people themselves: "Places designed with distrust get what they were looking for". Public spaces should be must be accessible to the public - if they are well designed they will be used and 'owned' by people and will become self-managing.
6. Indoor spaces - connectivity to the street and reason to use the space (food and/or retail) are even more important than for outside spaces; doors need to be open!
7. Catalysts - an external stimulus - the 'spark' - that gets people talking to each other - the street performer, 'character', physical object (e.g. sculpture), sight /view, etc.
It's worth noting that the spaces discussed in the book are in business districts in larger cities with high numbers of passersby. Whilst many of the principles will apply in any space, Whyte himself acknowledges that spaces only work with people, and sometimes people make the most unlikely spaces successful.

Tuesday 28 February 2012

Updated version of the concept diagram. If you think it would be better without the colour, or want to suggest any other changes let me know.



Some Christopher Alexander-isms, 'A Pattern Language – Towns, Buildings, Construction' '(1977)

Despite the age and US origins of the text, it still has significant value for our site and could assist with establishing a design framework for our concept. Alexander advocates enabling, through urban design, the potential for sub-cultures to flourish. This is in tune with our aims of enabling an arts and creative quarter to develop; the communities that we are designing for can be considered a distinctive sub-culture, with further sub-cultures within.

Our project could therefore be less about the usual urban design objectives, integration, connections, legibility etc. and more about creating a series of 'citidels'; Shoreditch, Manchester Northern Quarter, St. Ives developed because they are both distinctive and separate from their neighbouring communities. Alexander argues that the more communities become integrated with their neighbours the more they influence each other, resulting in a 'dull' lack of extremes.

How we encourage this within our own sites could be entirely down to us as individuals, moreover, a lack of coordination as we do it could be useful for creating distinctive quarters within the wider city; this seems more radical to me.

'In the heterogeneous city, people are mixed together, irrespective of their life style or culture. This seems rich. Actually it dampens all significant variety, arrests most of the possibilities for differentiation, and encourages conformity. It tends to reduce all lifestyles to a common denominator.' (p43)

Alexander argues that useful design methods for realising this goal are:

  • Public squares/forums for people to come together (within their sub-culture group)
  • Quality of light
  • Access to soft landscape/countryside
  • Enable a specialisation of work within each sub-culture – live/work, employment units etc
  • Reduce vehicles moving through a community (though I think we can also use roads as effective buffers)
  • Design buffers between communities that enable them to thrive in isolation – 200m at least but with meeting points where services essential to various adjacent sub-cultures can be accessed – clubs, clinics, pubs etc
  • Reduce entry/exit points to individual communities – more than 200 pcus per hour reduces the quality of life for residents.
  • Turn buildings away from neighbouring communities, facing into the sub-culture zone
  • Distribute essential shops across neighbourhoods so they can operate autonomously
  • Limit building heights to four storeys-unless dealing with major civic buildings
  • Build in water – of some sort
  • Open up educational centres, so that they better interact with local communities 'a market place of education'

...Tailored to the sub-culture one is designing for.